🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.