🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions regarding the remarks made by ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler after the Serbian champion's win over the American player during the US Open last eight. Consider – Fritz is American, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions often lend themselves to nationalism. Some letdown was appropriate. Rather, Fowler brought up the continued absence of American men at the majors: not one of them has won a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the tournament.

We all enjoy a storyline, myself included. But come on. Even if Fritz defeated Djokovic for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, whom he has never defeated in an official match. And had he someway survived that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, against whom the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven major titles (plus Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the next round). Fritz stated in press following his defeat that he in fact liked his draw, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the three best competitors in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is well justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an athlete is supposed to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian last eight match who else sensibly had the lack of US winners in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the world starting the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his last six encounters over third-ranked the German with growing comfort. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the future. But it’s clear that at present, that is as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a chasm of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class serve and powerful strength on each forehand and backhand are sufficiently adequate to dispose of the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. When facing the handful of generational talents, though, he is often overmatched. The last several years has seen the interesting emergence of tall, gangly athletes who can nonetheless move around with the surprising speed and fluidity of much shorter men. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a drop shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That acts as a quite harsh limitation on his potential.

Fritz has achieved a number of dramatic, improbable advancements over the years. Early on of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months after, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he suddenly exploded up to No 4 – and held the position. But the next leap, competing against and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing drought of American men winning grand slams when Fritz had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the appreciation for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that very quarter-final ought to have been enough of an indication. Djokovic won in four sets, a victory that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz earning plenty of chances to break. But the champion rescued break point after break point, prolonging the run to the brink of frustration. When he eventually did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly played a terrible game to lose his own serve once more; the Serbian had lulled him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to use excessive effort to prevail. Facing match points in the final game, his first serve floated to the sky. He extended the match two times on his backup delivery, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, only a result of having to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was fairly ironclad proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of Djokovic, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and did not particularly appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his athletic abilities now, but has developed enough knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is those who were expecting the American to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that suggested he could.

Fritz is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in media sessions, exceeding virtually everyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, willing to not only say how he feels or the strategy he believed determined a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States not spawn a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unfair. (Since Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

American legend Division

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely dwell on it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” the American told a journalist in June of winning a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is in fact extremely unlikely for everybody else. {